SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Ori) 92

P.K.MOHANTY, PRADIP MOHANTY
Sarat Chandra Panda – Appellant
Versus
Chief Executive Officer, CESCo – Respondent


Advocates:
For petitioner:M/s. D. R. Pattanayak, M. K. Khuntia, N. S. Panda
For Opp.Parties:M/s. P. K. Nanda

ORDER

4.3.2004 — Though this matter was listed today for orders, with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal.

Heard Mr. Pattanayak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nanda, learned counsel for the opposite parties.

The petitioner calls in question, the impugned order of punishment in a disciplinary proceeding, giving him compulsory retirement from service.

The petitioner was serving as a Junior Engineer (Electrical) at Nirakarpur Electrical Section in the district of Khurda, when a departmental proceeding was initiated on 13.11.1997 on the allegation of showing undue favour to a consumer in giving service connection without a meter, collection of unauthorised money from consumers for personal gains at the cost of the Company, negligence in duty, disobedience of orders of higher authorities and misconduct. The proceedings continued, charges were served, petitioner submitted his explanation denying all charges. An enquiry officer was appointed and the enquiry was conducted on 27.7.2000 and report was submitted, holding him guilty of Charge Nos. 4, 6, 8 and the charge regarding negligence in duty, according to the petitioner, the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top