A.K.PATNAIK, A.K.PARICHHA
Laxminarayan Mohanty – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. K. PATNAIK, J. : The petitioner was a licence in re¬spect of three I.M.F.L. ‘OFF’ shops in the district of Balasore for the years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000. For each of the three shops, an agreement was executed between the petitioner and the Collector, Balasore which, inter alia, provided that the petitioner will sell a minimum guaranteed quantity (for short, ‘M.G.Q.’) per month. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 5.12.2000 for reduction of M.G.Q. for the said three shops and by order dated 26.4.2002, the Government of Orissa in the Excise Department allowed a reduction of 20% on the existing M.G.Q. for the three shops for the years 1997-98, 1998-99 and 1999-2000. Pursuant to the said order dated 26.4.2002, the peti¬tioner has been asked to deposit arrear government revenue amounting to Rs.59,79,401/- towards short-drawn M.G.Q. of I.M.F.L. and Beer for the aforesaid three shops during the years 1997-98 to 1999-2000 by a demand notice dated 22.7.2003 issued by the Superintendent of Excise, Balasore in Annexure-9 to the writ petition. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for quashing the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.