SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 419

A.S.NAIDU
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Hari Mangaraj – Respondent


Advocates:
For Appellant:Mr.A.K.Misra & Associates
For Respondent:Mr.B.N. Samantaray & Associates

JUDGMENT

A. S. NAIDU, J. : The Union of India represented through its General Manager, South-Eastern Railway has preferred this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Tribunals Act assailing the order dated 20.7.2005 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bhubanes¬war in Case No.OA/56/2001. By the said order the Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs. 4,00,000.00 (four lakhs) with interest thereon at the rate of 4% from the date of filing of the case and directed the amount to be paid within sixty days from the date of receipt of the order, failing which the Railways would pay inter¬est at the rate of 6% per annum on the compensation amount calcu¬lated from the date of filing of the case.

2. Bereft of unnecessary details the present respondent as applicant had filed the aforesaid case before the Tribunal for compensation with the averments that on 9.8.2001 he had purchased a ticket bearing number 69005 for travelling by Jatni-Palasa Passenger Train from Kaipadar Road Station. After the train halted at Kaipadar Road Station, he along with other passengers tried to board the same. At that juncture suddenly the train started to move to a jerk. Consequently the passengers who were enter





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top