SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Ori) 199

A.S.NAIDU
Radhu Mishra – Appellant
Versus
Akura Apata – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:Mr.B. C. Panda
For Opp. Party:Mr. J. Rath

JUDGMENT

A. S. NAIDU, J. : The order dated 3.8.2004 vide Annexure-6, passed by the learned Civil Judge (JD), 2nd Court, Cuttack in Civil Suit No. 253 of 2002 is assailed in this Writ Petition by the defendant in that suit.

2. The aforesaid Civil suit has been filed by the present opposite party for cancellation of a sale deed. In the said suit a petition was filed on by the plaintiff-opposite party praying to summon the concerned Amin of the office of the Tahasildar, Niali for giving evidence with regard to a report said to have been submitted by him earlier during consolidation proceeding. The Court below by order dated 1.5.2004 rejected the said prayer on the ground that the name of the concerned Amin was not stated in the petition. However, the Court below granted liberty to the plaintiff-opposite party to file a fresh petition. A subsequent petition filed by the plaintiff for the self-same relief was gain rejected by the Court below by order dated 10.5.2004 on some technical ground. Thereafter the plaintiff filed a third petition on 28.6.2004 styling the same as one under Order 16, Rule 1(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure. Again the said petition was rejected by the Court below





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top