SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ori) 4

I.MAHANTY
Satrughan Patra – Appellant
Versus
Baikuntha Nath Mohapatra – Respondent


Advocates:
For Petitioner:M/s. Nisith Nisank and B. Pattnaik
For Opp.Party:M/s. S. K. Das, B. R. Sahoo, A. Das and P. S. Nayak

JUDGMENT

I. MAHANTY, J. — In this application under Section 401 Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioner has sought to challenge the judgment dated 2.9.2009 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Bhubaneswar in I.C.C. Case No.4174 of 2008 convicting him of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and sentencing him to undergo S.I. for three months and to pay compensation of Rs.23,000/- to the complainant within two months from the date of the judgment. Challenge has been further made to dismissal of the petitioner’s Criminal Appeal No.11/75 of 2010/2009 by the learned Ad hoc Addl. Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Bhubaneswar by his judgment dated 13.8.2010 thereby confirming the order passed against the accused-petitioner in I.C.C. Case No.4174 of 2008.

2.Two affidavits have been filed, one by the petitioner-Satrughan Patra and another, by the complainant-Baikuntha Nath Mohapatra, wherein it is stated that the dispute inter se the parties have been resolved and the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.23,000/- to the opposite party-complainant. The opposite party-complainant in his affidavit has accepted the aforesaid fact and has noted the fact that he does not want to proceed with t







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top