SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Ori) 186

SANJU PANDA
Debananda Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
For Appellant:M/s. S. Nayak, K.B. Kar, A.K. Parida & T.K. Sahoo
For Respondent:M/s. S.K. Padhi & G.Mishra

JUDGMENT

S. PANDA, J. — This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31.10.2006 passed by the learned Special Judge (CBI), Bhubaneswar in T.R. No.6 of 2003 convicting and sentencing the appellant for commission of offence under Section 7 read with Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act (in short, “the Act”).

2.The facts leading to the prosecution case are as follows:

The complainant-Kasinath Hota had applied for a new telephone connection for operating a public call booth. He had deposited the requisite fees with the Department and an advice note was issued in his favour. The complainant on several occasions met the accused and requested him to provide the connectivity as the accused was then serving as a regular Mazdoor incharge of Manikagoda Exchange. The accused demanded an illegal gratification of Rs.1000/- from the complainant on 8.1.2003. Therefore, on 11.1.2003 the complainant lodged an FIR before the SP, CBI, Bhubaneswar who directed G.R. Mohanty, Inspector, CBI, Bhubaneswar to take up the investigation of the case. A trap was arranged on the same date. At the instance of the Inspector, CBI, the complainant, two other independent witnesses and ot















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top