G.K.MISRA, P.K.MOHANTI
BHAGIRATHI MAHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
Mohanti, J. :- The petitioners who are goldsmiths of Puri town are being prosecuted for offences under Sections 147, 353, 341, 225 and 414, Indian Penal Code. They pray for anticipatory bail which is opposed by the learned Standing Counsel for the State. The matter has come up before us on a reference made by our learned brother Panda, J.
2. The petitioners aver that on the allegations that when the police officers had gone to search the shop of one Dhruba Charan Sahu of Puri town and were making enquiries at another shop, Dhruha Charan Sahu was found slipping away with a bag suspected to contain stolen articles. The police officials rushed to the shop of Dhruba Charan Sahu and asked him to show the bag. Upon his refusal and raising hulla, about 100 people including the petitioners gathered at the place and it is alleged that the said persons prevented the police from discharging their duties. During the commotion, it is alleged, Dhruba Charan Sahu passed on the bag to some other person and it could not be seized. On the aforesaid allegations G. R. Case No. 441 of 1975 has been started in the court of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Puri for commission of offences u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.