SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Ori) 41

G.K.MISRA, P.K.MOHANTI
BHAGIRATHI MAHAPATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

Mohanti, J. :- The petitioners who are goldsmiths of Puri town are being prosecuted for offences under Sections 147, 353, 341, 225 and 414, Indian Penal Code. They pray for anticipatory bail which is opposed by the learned Standing Counsel for the State. The matter has come up before us on a reference made by our learned brother Panda, J.

2. The petitioners aver that on the allegations that when the police officers had gone to search the shop of one Dhruba Charan Sahu of Puri town and were making enquiries at another shop, Dhruha Charan Sahu was found slipping away with a bag suspected to contain stolen articles. The police officials rushed to the shop of Dhruba Charan Sahu and asked him to show the bag. Upon his refusal and raising hulla, about 100 people including the petitioners gathered at the place and it is alleged that the said persons prevented the police from discharging their duties. During the commotion, it is alleged, Dhruba Charan Sahu passed on the bag to some other person and it could not be seized. On the aforesaid allegations G. R. Case No. 441 of 1975 has been started in the court of the Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Puri for commission of offences u









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top