SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Ori) 115

D.PATHAK, D.P.MOHAPATRA
KHAGESWAR PUJARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

D. Pathak, C. J.:- The appellant Khageswar Pujari has been convicted by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Bhawanipatna under Section 302 I.P.C and sentenced to undergo R. I. for life for murdering his daughter Basanti aged about 2½ years.

2. The facts of this case are telling and stand almost uncontroverted. The evidence on record as to the factum of infliction of injury by the appellant on the victim while she was feasting on some soaked rice in the morning of the date of occurrence is conclusive and of clinching nature.

3. As the appellant was not represented by any Counsel we engaged Mr. Krutibas Kar, Advocate to represent him at the State expense.

4. The only point that has been urged by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the appellant at the time of the occurrence was labouring under mental insanity covered by the general exception engrafted under Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel further submits that the Trial Court did not properly appreciate the evidence on record although it was the duty of the Court to have considered all the factors and the relevant evidence attending the case in order to find out as to whether the provision























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top