I.MAHANTY
Ramakanta Sahoo – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Prasad Panda – Respondent
Judgment
I. Mahanty, J.
The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner-Ramakanta Sahoo with a prayer to quash the order dated 09.08.1996 passed in 1.C.C. Case No.6 of 1996, by which order the learned S.D.J.M., Biramaharajpur has been pleased to take cognizance against the petitioner for the offence under Section 409/34, I.P.C. The essential ground of challenge by the petitioner, who was then working as Block Development Officer (B.D.O), is noncompliance of Section 197 Cr.P.C.
2. Mr. S.R. Mulia, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that on perusal of the complaint petition, it would be clear that the complainant was a resident of village Lumarjena and it was alleged that improvement of the village road was executed by the B.D.O. (petitioner herein) and Junior Engineer-Sk. Abdul Raif, who claimed to be in-charge of the said road improvements. It was further alleged that the present petitioner-B.D.O and the Junior Engineer acted in a negligent manner and alleging various irregularities in carrying out of such improvements of the village road for which the villagers had made complaint to the Sub-Collector claiming the said work of an inferior
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.