SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(Ori) 16

ASOK KUMAR GANGULY, B.N.MAHAPATRA
VOLTAS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. K. Nayak, L. Mishra, K. K. Jena - Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

B. N. Mahapatra, J. - In this tax revision petition, the petitioner has raised several questions of law, but at the time of hearing, the same are confined to the following three modified questions :

(i) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the reopening of the assessment under section 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 is justified as no reason has been indicated in the notice issued under the said section and that the reassessment proceeding has not been initiated on change of opinion of the Sales Tax Officer ?

(ii) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa, is correct in holding that the subsequent sale effected by the petitioner to the Orissa Power Generation Corporation and the National Thermal Power Corporation is not in course of inter-State sale but intra-State sale and does not qualify for exemption as contemplated in section 6(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 ?

(iii) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the assessing officer is not justified to impose penalty under section 12(8) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act ?

The background in which this tax revision case has been filed is as follow



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top