SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Ori) 96

G.B.PATTANAIK, LINGARAJA RATH
EDEL CAST INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SALES TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R. Mohanty, for the petitioner.
R. K. Patra (Additional Government Advocate), for the opposite parties.

JUDGMENT

L. RATH, J. - The petitioner having been assessed both under the Central Sales Tax Act and the Orissa Sales Tax Act for the assessment year 1978-79, in respect of the same transaction of sale, has approached this Court in these two writ petitions for quashing of the same. O.J.C. No. 12 of 1980 relates to the assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act and O.J.C. No. 13 of 1980 relates to the assessment under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The facts, which are not disputed, and appear from the assessment order under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, are that the petitioner is in the trade of securing orders from outside the State, mostly from cement factories, and only from two others, M/s. Hindusthan Zinc Ltd. and M/s. Hindusthan Copper Ltd., for sale of a very hard metal commercially known as cylpebs. The petitioner purchases the articles from M/s. Siva Metal Industries by furnishing declarations in form XXXIV. Thereafter, as appears from the order of assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, the petitioner issued C form declarations to M/s. Siva Metal Industries and directed the latter to book the goods as consignor to a particular place and transfer the railway receipts or the lorr






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top