SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Ori) 38

K.B.PANDA, R.N.MISRA
KAMARU ZUMAN KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. C. Mohapatra, for the petitioner.
The Standing Counsel, for the opposite party.

JUDGMENT

MISRA, J. - These are references under section 24(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The Additional Sales Tax Tribunal has stated these cases and has referred the following question for opinion of this Court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the Additional Sales Tax Tribunal is correct in holding that agarbattis should be taxed as 'perfumery' article coming under the purview of entry in serial No. 36 of the Rate Chart provided for taxing luxury goods, when he recorded a specific finding that agarbattis are not luxury goods ?"

2. Section 5 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act contains the scheme under which there is a uniform prescribed rate for imposition of tax on the taxable turnover. The proviso appearing under sub-section (1) authorises the State Government from time to time by notification and subject to such conditions as may be imposed to fix a higher rate of tax not exceeding thirteen per cent or a lower rate of tax on the sale transactions. The assessee in the instant case is a dealer in agarbattis. The relevant periods of assessment are 1971-72 and 1972-73. Petitioner paid tax at rate of seven per cent for three quarters of the first year and at e









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top