SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Ori) 11

B.K. Ray, R.N. Misra, JJ.
STATE OF ORISSA
Versus
GESTETNER DUPLICATORS (P.) LTD.
S.J.C. No. 240 of 1972
Decided On: Decided On : 15-01-1974

Advocates Appeared:
The Standing Counsel (S.T.), for the petitioner.
N. Bhattacharya, for the opposite party.

The meaning of "paper" under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, should be interpreted in its ordinary sense, considering the chemical composition, purpose, and common understanding of the term.

Headnote:

STENCIL PAPER - TAXATION - ORISSA SALES TAX ACT, 1947 - SECTION 5(1) - Whether stencil paper is paper as specified in serial No. 7-A of the schedule as notified by the State Government - Whether stencil paper should be taxed at 5 per cent under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, a dealer in duplicating machines, duplicating paper, and stencil paper, disputed the rate of sales tax applicable to stencil paper. The State claimed that stencil paper fell under serial No. 7-A of the notification issued under section 5(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947, which specified various types of paper subject to a 7% tax rate. The assessee contended that stencil paper was not included in any of the specified items and should be taxed at the general rate of 5%.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that stencil paper is not paper within the meaning of serial No. 7-A of the notification. Therefore, the higher rate of tax at 7% is not applicable to the sale of stencil paper. Sales of stencil paper are exigible to tax at the rate of 5% under the Act.

Issues: 1. Whether stencil paper is paper as specified in serial No. 7-A of the schedule as notified by the State Government? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Member, Additional Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa, is justified in holding that the stencil paper should be taxed at 5 per cent under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947?

Ratio Decidendi: The court applied the ordinary meaning of the word "paper" and found that stencil paper does not fall within the common understanding of paper. The court also considered the chemical composition and purpose of stencil paper and found that it is not a substitute for paper in the ordinary sense.

Final Decision: The court answered the questions referred to it by holding that stencil paper is not paper as specified in serial No. 7-A of the schedule and that the learned Member, Additional Sales Tax Tribunal, was justified in holding that stencil paper should be taxed at 5% under the Orissa Sales Tax Act.

JUDGMENT

R. N. MISRA, J. - This is a reference made under section 24(1) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by the Additional Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa, at the instance of the State of the following questions for determination of this court :

"(1) Whether stencil paper is paper as specified in serial No. 7-A of the schedule as notified by the State Government from time to time in exercise of the powers conferred by the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 ?

(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned Member, Additional Sales Tax Tribunal, Orissa, is justified in holding that the stencil paper should be taxed at 5 per cent under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 ?"

The assessee deals in duplicating machines, duplicating paper and stencil paper, etc. The dispute is as to whether stencil paper is paper as provided under serial No. 7-A of the appropriate Government notification. Serial No. 7-A reads as follows :

"Paper including all kinds of pasteboard, millboard, straw-board, cardboard, blotting-papers, newsprint, cartridge paper, packing paper, paper registers, note-books, exercise books, envelopes, labels, letter pads, writing tables and flat files made out of paper."

The rate of sales tax prescribed for these materials is 7 per cent. According to the State, stencil paper comes within this category. According to the assessee, stencil paper is an item not included in any of the specified items and, therefore, the rate of tax under the Act is 5 per cent.

2. Paper has admittedly no definition under the statute or in any sister legislation and, therefore, must be given the meaning attributed to the word in common parlance. The Shorter Oxford Dictionary says that paper is "a substance composed of fibres interlaced into a compact web, made form linen and cotton rages, straw, wood, certain grasses, etc., which are macerated into a pulp, dried, and pressed; it is used for writing, printing or drawing on, for wrapping things in, for covering the interior of walls, etc. Also applied to other substances used for writing upon, ......" Stencil is said to be a piece of thin sheet metal, leather, paper or the like, having a pattern perforated or cut out, through which a pigment may be applied to a surface to be marked or decorated (Webster's Universal Dictionary). Corpus Juris Secundum, Vol. 82, page 1052, gives meaning to "stencil" by saying :

"A thin plate or sheet of any substance in which a figure, letter or pattern is formed by cutting completely through the plate."

As it appears, stencil consists of various organic chemical compounds including nitro-cellulose fibres in order to give it a thin sheet like form. In order to use this for the purpose of duplicating, it has to be cut either by a typewriter or by a stylus pen so as to remove the chemicals from the places where the stroke is made. It is indeed not a substitute of paper in the ordinary sense. The test to be used to find out whether stencil is paper is available from the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax v. S. N. Brothers ([1973] 31 S.T.C. 302 (S.C.)). Dealing with the words "dyes and colours" used in entry No. 10 and the words "scents and perfumes" used in entry No. 37 under the U.P. Sales Tax Act of 1948, the Supreme Court said :

"They have to be construed 'in their own context' and in the sense, as ordinarily understood and attributed to these words by people usually conversant with and dealing in such goods."

3. We have been shown two decisions of the Allahabad High Court which are relevant. In Kores (India) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh ([1970] 26 S.T.C. 126.), the Allahabad High Court was called upon to find out whether carbon-paper would be paper. The court found that carbon-paper was not paper by saying :

"When carbon-paper is sold, it is not sold as tissue paper but as a material whose value and significance lies entirely in the chemical







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top