SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1949 Supreme(Ori) 49

JAGANNADHA DAS
Harihar Mahapatra – Appellant
Versus
Hari Otha – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. Ray - for Appellant. M.S. Rao and Advocate-General - for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- Plaintiffs ace the appellants is this second appeal. They own only about 1/3rd of the lands in Inam village called Agulpada. Defendants 1 to 4 are owners of lands is the neighbouring village of Gopinathpar which also is an Inam village. They have been sued as representing all the Inamdars of that village. Defendant 5 is the Government of Orissa represented by the Collector of Ganjam. The teat of the lands admittedly belong to the Dharakote Estate. The dispute relates to the right of the plaintiffs to irrigate their lands from the waters of a channel known as Kochianala by raising a cross dam on it. This Nala runs through the two villages of Gopinathpar and Agulpada. According to the evidence of one of the plaintiffs witnesses, P.W. 3, Kochianala starts in Government villages and goes to Government villages, but passes through these two Inam villages. The case of the plaintiffs is that this Kochianala is the irrigation source of the wet lands in the Inam, village of Agulpada; that the irrigation rights were being exercised by patting up a cross dam and that there used to be a pucca masonry dam at a specified place in the channel for diverting water to their village; that
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top