PANIGRAHI
Krupasindhu Panigrahi – Appellant
Versus
Rex – Respondent
Order. - The petnr. was served with a notice under S. 112, Cr. P. C., to show cause why he should not be directed to execute a bond to be of good behaviour under S. 110, Cr. P. C. for a period of three years. Along with the petnr. two other persons were also impleaded and served with similar notices and an enquiry M. C. No. 647/47 was started against the three persons by the Subdivisional Mag., Ghumusur. The Police filed a report under S. 110 (d), (e) and (f), Cr. P. C. against these three persons on 24-9-47 and cited 84 instances of acts of misbehaviour and offences alleged to have been committed or threatened to have been committed by one or the other of the persons named in the report covering a period of over twelve years commencing from 1935. The Police also cited 140 witnesses to be examined to prove the various acts of high-handedness alleged to have been committed at different times by these persons. The Mag. drew up proceedings on the 4th November in the following terms :
"Perused the report of the S. I, of Police, Aska and it appears from the Police report that you (1) Krupasindhu Panigrahi (2) Dondia Gowdo, and (3) Bancha Palo of village Horodapadoro, P. S. Aska, within t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.