SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Ori) 42

NARASIMHAM, MOHAPATRA
Krishna Chandra Sahani – Appellant
Versus
Anem Peda Siva Paravatamma – Respondent


Advocates:
N.S.B.K. Pal, for Appellant; P.V.B. Rao and H. Mohapatra, for Respondent.

Judgement

MOHAPATRA, J. :- This appeal of the judgment-debtor No.6, arising out of an execution proceeding, is against the judgment of Sri R.C. Misra, Subordinate Judge of Berhampur, rejecting his petition under section 47, Civil Procedure Code, taking up an objection of limitation. The decree, under execution, is a mortgage decree, the preliminary decree being dated 7-1-32 and the final decree being dated 2-11-32. The present execution petition was filed on 11-9-45, clearly beyond 12 years from the date of the final decree.

2. The original decree-holder was one Anem Tatayya. He had two sons, Anem Basanna and Anem Narasimhulu. Anem Narasimhulu is alive and has transferred his share in the decree to the 6th judgment-debtor, Krisna Chandra Sahani. Anem Basanna having died, his widow, Anem Peda Siva Paravatamma, has filed the present execution petition. Judgment-debtors 1 to 5 have no more interest inasmuch as they have sold their interest in the mortgage property and the sale proceeds have been paid towards the decree. The judgment-debtors 6 and 7 were subsequent purchasers in respect of some of the mortgage properties. The 7th judgment-debtor is dead and his two sons are judgment-debt

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top