SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Ori) 73

JAGANNADHA DAS, NARASIMHAM, MOHAPATRA
Jagadindra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Revenue Commr – Respondent


Advocates:
P.K. Bose and H.K. Bose, for Petitioners; B. Mohapatra, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

NARASIMHAM, J. :- This Special Bench was constituted to hear the preliminary question as to whether the decision of a Division Bench of this Court in- Sri Rama Chandra v. Collector of Agricultural Income-tax, AIR 1952 Orissa 281 (A) regarding the construction of the words "an order under S.28 enhancing an assessment or otherwise prejudicial to him" occurring in sub-s.(2) of S.29, Orissa Agricultural Income-tax Act, requires revision in view of the decision of the Privy Council in-Commr. of Income-tax West Punjab, North West Frontier and Delhi Provinces, Lahore v. Tribune Trust Lahore, AIR 1948 PC 102 (B) which unfortunately was not cited before the said Division Bench of this Court.

2. The petitioner was assessed to agricultural income-tax by the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Balasore. He appealed against the assessment to the Collector of Agricultural Income-tax under S.25, Orissa Agricultural Income-tax Act. The Collector gave him partial relief and directed revision of the assessment in accordance with the instructions contained in his order dated 8-12-49. Against the appellate order of the Collector of Income-tax, the petitioner had two remedies (i) a petition in rev


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top