SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Ori) 76

PANIGRAHI, MOHAPATRA
Nanda Kishore Naik – Appellant
Versus
Sukti Dibya – Respondent


Advocates:
S.K. De, for Appellant; S.K. Mohant, for Respondents.

Judgement

MOHAPATRA, J. :- This second appeal is against the confirming judgment dated 30-1-48 of Sri C.C. Coari, District Judge of Cuttack, in M.A. 124 of 1946. It is defendant 1 who is the appellant in this second appeal.

2. The plaintiff (Narasingha Chandra Panda), Dibyasingha (the deceased husband of defendant 2) and Babaji were three brothers. Babaji died long ago leaving no heirs. Dibyasingha died on 20-4-34. Defendant 2, the widow of Dibyasingha, executed a deed of sale in favour of defendant 1, the appellant, on 16-2-44. The plaintiffs present suit is on the allegation that Dibyasingha died in a state of jointness with him, and as such, plaintiff is the sole surviving coparcener, and defendant 2 had no right, title or interest whatsoever in respect of the property to execute a valid deed of transfer in favour of defendant 1. So he prays for declaration of title and for confirmation of possession, or in the alternative, for recovery of possession.

3. The defence is that there was separation in status between the plaintiff and his deceased brother Dibyasingha; as such, defendant 2 could execute a valid deed of transfer in favour of the appellant.

4. Both the Courts below have com


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top