SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 23

PANIGRAHI, NARASIMHAM
Jagabandhu Das – Appellant
Versus
Babaji Jena – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S. Khan and H. Mohapatra, for Petitioners; B.N. Das and P.C. Chatterji, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

PANIGRAHI, C. J. :- These are three civil revision petitions filed under S.115, Civil P.C., seeking to revise the orders passed in three cases by the Collector acting under the Orissa Tenants Protection Act (Orissa Act 3 of 1948). C.R.301/1949 was presented on 12-10-49 against an order of the Additional District Magistrate, Cuttack, confirming the order passed by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Jaipur allowing the opposite party tenants to cultivate the disputed lands. C.R. 350/1949 was filed on 10-12-49 challenging the correctness of an order passed by the Additional District Magistrate, Puri, in appeal, against an order of the Sub-Deputy Collector, Khurdha, permitting the tenant-opposite parties to cultivate the lands and imposing a fine of Rs.100/-on the petitioners under S.10 (1), Orissa Tenants Protection Act. The order imposing the fine was, however, set aside by the Additional District Magistrate, while the order directing the tenants to be put in possession was confirmed. C. R.351/1949 was filed on 10-12-49 against the appellate order of the Additional District Magistrate, Puri, confirming the order of the Deputy Collector under S.7, Orissa Tenants Protection Act, a





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top