SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Ori) 14

NARASIMHAM
Panua Bhoi – Appellant
Versus
Mahanta Jagannath Ramanuj Das – Respondent


Advocates:
G.K. Misra, for Petitioners; P. Mohanti, for Opposite Party.

ORDER : - This is a revision petition by the second party against an order under S.145, Cr.P.C. passed by a first class Magistrate of Puri declaring the first party (opposite party) to be entitled to possession of the disputed property which consists of about 60.67 acres in village Rebatiraman, P.S. Sadar, in the district of Puri. About nine acres of the disputed property consist of paddy lands and the rest are cocoanut gardens, orchards and tanks. The opposite partys case was that the entire property was in their actual possession and that the ancestors of the petitioners were just allowed to reside in the cocoanut garden and render service to Lord Jagannath on ceremonial occasions. The petitioners however contended that their ancestors reclaimed the lands, laid up cocoanut gardens and orchards and prepared paddy fields which they were holding on bhag basis under the first party. Both sides led evidence; but the learned Magistrate preferred the evidence of the first party. Apparently, the case was not conducted with proper care and clear evidence about separate possession of the paddy fields as distinct from the evidence about possession of the orchards and tanks was not led. In t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top