SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Ori) 10

NARASIMHAM, P.V.B.RAO
Rupa Gauntiani – Appellant
Versus
Sriyabati – Respondent


Advocates:
H. Mohapatra and R.N. Misra, for Appellants; N. Pasayat, for Respondent.

Judgement

P. V. B. RAO, J.:- This Second Appeal is by the defendants against the reversing judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Balangir decreeing the plaintiffs suit for maintenance.

2. Plaintiff is the widow of one late Manglu Gountia who predeceased his father Chaudhury Gountia. Defendant No.1 is the widow of the said Chaudhury Gountia and defendant No.2 is his son. It was alleged in the plaint that defendant No.2 was born to a concubine of Choudhury Gountia but point was not pressed in the lower appellate court. Defendant No.1 died during the pendency of the Second Appeal and defendant No.2 the sole appellant now is the only person entitled to all the properties of late Chaudhury Gountia.

3. It is alleged in the plaint that Choudhury Gountia died about one year prior to the suit and that he left considerable properties which were inherited by defendants. It is not stated in the plaint nor is there anything in evidence to show that these properties were ancestral properties in the hands of Chaudhury Gountia. Both parties proceeded on the common ground that they were the self-acquired properties of Choudhury Gountia.

4. Plaintiff claimed arrears of maintenance for 3 years prior to th


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top