NARASIMHAM, S.P.MOHAPATRA
Anem Pedda Siva Parvathmma – Appellant
Versus
Krushna Chandra Sahani – Respondent
Judgement
MOHAPATRA, J. :- This appeal has been filed by defendant 3 against the confirming judgment of the lower appellate Court arising out of a suit for recovery of Rs. 1000/- in the following circumstances :
2. One Anem Tatayya had two sons, Anem Basanna and Anem Narasimhulu. The present defendant 1 is Anem Narasimhulu and his son is defendant 2. Defendant 3 the appellant, is the widow of Anem Basanna, who died on 10-1-1942. Anem Tatayya obtained a mortgage decree against Agadhu Bissoi and others (who are not parties to the present suit) in original suit No. 11/1924 and eventually obtained a final decree for a sum of Rs. 5700 and odd on 2-11-1932. The decree-holder Anem Tatayya had realised a sum of Rs. 2900/- from the judgment-debtors. Defendant 1 (Anem Narasimhulu) executed a deed of transfer (Ex. 10) on 13-8-1934 in favour of the present plaintiff in respect of his half share in the above mortgage decree.
It is to be mentioned here, Anem Tatayya died nearly a month prior to this deed of transfer on 3-7-1934. Anem Basanna, the elder son, realised a further sum of Rs. 2000/- towards the decretal amount on 3-9-1935. The present plaintiff-transferee in respect of the half share of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.