SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Ori) 29

NARASIMHAM, MOHAPATRA
Patnala Bhimayya Subudhi – Appellant
Versus
Kundana Bibi – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S. Rao, for Appellant; S.C. Palit, for Respondents.

Judgement

NARASIMHAM, J. :- This is an appeal by the plaintiff against theappellate judgment of the Addl. District Judge of Berhampur reversing the judgment of the Addl. Munsif of Aska and dismissing the plaintiffs suitfor partition of a house.

2. The house in dispute originally belonged to one Saudagar Ismail who died leaving two sons named Md. Issack and Abdul Waheb. On 29-3-1934, the plaintiff obtained a sale deed from. Md. Issack by which the latter purported to convey to him the whole of the house alleging that he was the sole owner of the same. On 3-10-1934, however deft. 3 obtained a sale deed from one Kundana Bibi, the widow of Abdul Waheb, by which she purported to convey to him the whole house

alleging that she was the sole owner of the same.

As was to be expected, disputes started between the two purchasers and the plaintiff instituted a suit (O. S. No. 311/37) for recovery of possession of the whole house, His suit was decreed by the then Addl. Munsif of Aska. But on appeal (Appeal No. 26/38) the Subordinate Judge of Berhampur modified the Judgment of the trial court and decreed the plaintiffs suit to the extent of eight annas share of the house only.

He further gave a direc













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top