SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Ori) 2

NARASIMHAM, MOHAPATRA
Bhima Shaw – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
In Criminal Appeal. No. 9 of 1954 :
M.N. Das and S.N. Dasgupta, for Appellants; Advocate-General and S. Acharya and R.K. Mohapatra, for Respondent.
In Criminal Appeal No. 15 of 1954 :
B.C. Raymohasay, for Appellants; Advocate-General and S. Acharya and R.K. Mohapatra, for Respondent.
In Cr. A. Nos. 20 to 27 of 1954 and Cr. A. Nos. 36 to 41 of 1954 :
B.K. Pal, for Appellants; Advocate-General and S. Acharya and R.K. Mohapatra, for Respondent.
In Govt. A. No. 8 of 1954 :
Advocate-General and S. Acharya and R.K. Mohapatra, for Appellants; S.N. Das Gupta, for Respondent.
In Cr. Revn. No. 103 of 1954 :
Advocate-General and S. Acharya and R.K. Mohapatra, for Petitioner.

Judgement

NARASIMHAM, J. :- This is an appeal from the judgment of the Sessions Judge of Balasore convicting the appellants under S. 400, Penal Code and sentencing them to various terms of imprisonment. Fortyfive persons were tried in the Court of the learned Sessions Judge for an offence under S. 400, I.P.C., on the allegation that they belonged to a gang of persons associated for the purpose of habitually committing dacoity during the period from 28-11-49 to 18-7-52.

The learned Sessions Judge convicted twenty-three persons and acquitted the rest. The State Government preferred an appeal (Government Appeal No. 8 of 1954) against the acquittal of Abhimanyu Sahu, Paramananda Behera and Kalicharan Maharana. They also filed a revision petition (Crl. Rev. No. 103/54) for enhancement of the sentence passed on Gour Chandra Dutta and Amulya Chandra Das. Of the convicted persons accused Haradnan Mukherji, Gour Chandra Dutta, Kalu Khan, Sk. Kasi alias Kasiruddin and Gourhari Jena did not prefer any appeal against their conviction and sentence.

The remaining convicted persons preferred both regular appeals and jail appeals. All these appeals and the criminal revision were heard together and wi














































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top