SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Ori) 39

NARASIMHAM, DAS
Syam Sundar Misra – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
N.V. Ramdas and G.K. Misra, for petitioner; H.C. Panda and Advocate-General, for Opposite Party.

Judgement

NARASIMHAM, C.J. :- This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution by the Manager of Parlakimedi Municipality against an order of dismissal from service passed by the Commissioner and Special Officer of the Municipality (hereinafter referred to as the Special Officer) Sri K. M, Das on 1-4-51 after a departmental enquiry. The petitioner filed an appeal to the State Government on 1-5-51. But it appears that no orders were passed by the Government on the appeal. It is indeed strange that an appeal of this type should have remained undisposed of by the Government for such a long period. In sheer despair the petitioner came to this Court for relief under Art. 226 of the Constitution on 22-9-55 and though the learned Advocate General appeared for the State of Orissa during the hearing of this petition he has not been able to enlighten us as to what happened to the petitioners appeal.

2. The conditions of service of the petitioner as an employee of a Municipality governed by the Madras District Boards Act, 1920, were regulated by various Rules and Orders issued by the appropriate authority from time to time. On behalf of the Municipality it was stated that the procedure to
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top