SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 21

S.P.MOHAPATRA
Chandhala Bewa – Appellant
Versus
Madhab Panda – Respondent


Advocates:
S.C. Ghosh, for Appellant; S.C. Roy, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- This is a plaintiffs second appeal against the reversing judgment of the lower appellate Court arising out of a suit for declaration of title and for confirmation of possession, or, in the alternative, for recovery of possession. The plaintiff who is an old and illiterate widow impugns the two transactions Exs. A and C dated 31-5-45 and 14-8-45 respectively on the ground that she was never aware of the execution of the documents and she did never convey the properties which were the subject matter of these two documents in favour of the vendees.

The defendants are the vendees and also subsequent transferees from the Vendees, Ex. A is in respect of an area 1.311 which purports to be for a consideration of Rs. 300/- and Ex. C in respect of homestead with an area of .041 which purports to be for a consideration of Rs. 100/-. The defence is that the transactions are bona fide and for consideration and that that suit is hit by the provisions of Article 91 of the Limitation Act and as such is liable to be dismissed on the ground of limitation.

2. The trial Court gave a conditional decree in favour of the plaintiff that she would be entitled to got possession of the properties i








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top