SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 46

S.P.MOHAPATRA, S.BARMAN
Govinda Jiew Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Surendra Jena – Respondent


Advocates:
S.C. Das, for Appellants; B.K. Pal, P. Kar and A.C. Mohanty, for Respondents.

Judgement

MOHAPATRA, J. :- The plaintiffs are the appellants in the First Appeal against the judgment and decree passed by Sri B. Misra, Subordinate Judge of Balasore, arising out of a suit for declaration of title of the deity Govinda Jiew Thakur, plaintiff No. 1 and for recovery of possession of the disputed properties with an acreage 19,99 acres. Plaintiff No. 1, the deity, is situated in Bhadrak and plaintiffs 2 and 3 are the trustees representing the deity and were appointed as trustees by the Endowment Commissioner.

The contesting defendants 1 to 18 are the transferees in respect of the disputed properties on the basis of three sale-deeds and all of them being of 22nd January, 1927. One of the sale deeds was in favour of defendants 1 to 3 that is, Jena transferees; the second one was in favour of the defendants 4 to 8, that is Rout transferees; and the third was in favour of defendants 9 to 18, that is, Misra transferees.

Defendant No. 19 is the Ex-Mahant who has since been removed and plaintiffs 2 and 3 have been appointed as trustees by the Endowment Commissioner. The plaintiffs case is that the properties in dispute are the endowed properties belonging to the deity, plaintiff



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top