SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 42

S.BARMAN
South Eastern Railway – Appellant
Versus
Epari Satyanarayana – Respondent


Advocates:
B.K. Pal, for Petitioner; M.K.C. Rao, for Opposite Party.

ORDER :- The defendant railway is the petitioner in this Civil Revision directed against the judgment of the S.C.C. Judge, Berhampur, in S.C.C. Suit No. 120 of 1957 whereby the learned Judge decreed the plaintiffs suit for Rs. 373/- for alleged loss of some consignment of medicines stated to have been entrusted to the defendant railway at Howrah to be delivered to the plaintiff consignee at Berhampur, (Ganjam) on the South Eastern Railway.

2. The facts, shortly, are these : On August 20, 1956, the said consignment of medicine was booked at Howrah Station. Four days thereafter on August 24, 1956, delivery of the case containing the consignment was made at Berhampur. The weight of the goods as per railway receipt was stated to be 17 seers but the weight found at the time of delivery was 91/2 seers, that is to say, 71/2 seers short. Ext. 4, the shortage certificate, reads as follows :

"Case arrived in sound and intact condition and delivered under D/R. On demand reweighment found 9 1/2 seers against R/R weight 17 seers. Hence short weight only certified".

Thereafter, the plaintiff took the case home and opened it in the presence of P.Ws. 2 and 3. The basis of the plaintiffs claim in the

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top