SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Ori) 118

S.BARMAN
Krushna Kar – Appellant
Versus
Kanhu Charan Kar – Respondent


Advocates:
R. N. Misra and R. S. Sahu, for Appellants; J. C. Lenka, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT:- The defendants 1, 2 and 3 are the appellants from a confirming decision of the 1st Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuttack. where by he affirmed a decision of the learned Munsif, Kendrapara and decreed the plaintiffs suit for partition with a prayer under S.4 of the Partition Act for buying up the portion of the dwelling house sold by defendant No.1 to two stranger purchasers defendant Nos.2 and 3.

2. A genealogical table, - showing the relationship of the parties, other than the purchaser defendants 2 and 3, who are outsiders, - is set out as follows:

The defendants 2 and 3 are purchasers from the defendant No.1 and they are strangers to the family. The suit property is the joint family property of the family including the family dwelling house. The plaintiffs suit is for partition, with a prayer for buying up the portion of the joint family property - including the undivided family dwelling house, - sold by the defendant No.1 to the defendants 2 and 3. The defence, taken in the suit, is that there were two prior partitions between the members of the family - the first partition having been between the two ancestors of the family, - Madhu and Rama, being the heads of the tw









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top