G.K.MISRA
Mulia Maharana – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Patra – Respondent
ORDER :- Plaintiff is the petitioner. On 9-3-1962 issues were settled and the suit was adjourned for trial to 23-4-1962. On that day the plaintiff and defendant 1 filed haziras; as the Court was engaged in another part-heard suit, this suit was adjourned to 9-7-1962 for trial. On that day defendant I was ready and filed hazira; out the plaintiff applied for time. The prayer for adjournment was rejected and the parties were directed to get ready at once. Later, on the same day, the following order was passed :
"The plaintiff neither responds to calls nor takes any steps. The defendant 1 is ready. Hence the suit is dismissed for plaintiffs default in presence of defendant 1."
On 11-7-1962 the plaintiff filed an application under Order 9, Rule 9, C.P.C. for setting aside the order dated 3-7-1962. He alleged therein that one of his material witnesses was suffering from fever and the other missed the bus, and so he could not get ready on 9-7-1962. The learned Munsif disbelieved the story and held that there was no sufficient cause for non-appearance. The learned Subordinate Judge came to a different conclusion that the plaintiff had sufficient cause for his non-appearance. Both the Courts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.