SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ori) 269

B.R.SARANGI
Pradeep Kumar Patra – Appellant
Versus
Radhamohan Padhi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For petitioner: M/s A. Das, G.P. Panda, S.K. Swain & A. Das.
For opp. Party : None

JUDGMENT


Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J. The opposite party being the complainant filed a complaint case bearing I.C.C. Case No. 215 of 1999 before the court of the learned S.D.J.M., Bhubaneswar under Section 138 of the N.I. Act in which the learned Magistrate took cognizance by order dated 25.7.2000, which is sought to be challenged in the present application.

2. The fact as revealed from the complaint petition is that on 10.12.1998, the petitioner issued a cheque for Rs. 30,000/- in favour of the opposite party bearing cheque No. 749465 dated 10.12.1998 drawn on State Bank of India, C&I Division, Bhubaneswar, Main Branch towards payment of his personal debt. It is stated that the said amount had been borrowed by the petitioner from the opposite party on 13.08.1997 by executing a promissory note for the said value. After obtaining the said cheque, the opposite party deposited the same in Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd., Bhubaneswar and the Bank forwarded the said cheque for clearance, which was returned for non-clearance “due to insufficient fund”. On 31.3.1999, the complainant-opposite party through his Advocate intimated the fact of non-clearance/non-encashment of the cheque to the petitioner b















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top