SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Ori) 278

ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
C.R. DASH, J.
Hindusthan Lever Limited and another - Petitioners
Versus
The Collector & District Magistrate, Sundargarh - Opp. Party
W.P. (C) No.58 of 2003
Decided On : 25.09.2013

Advocates Appeared:
For Petitioners: M/s. S.C. Lal, S. Lal and S. Panda.
For Opp. Party :Additional Government Advocate.

Headnote:1. ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1955 - Sec. 6(A) - Removal of (Licensing Requirements, Stock limits and Movement Restriction) on Specified Foodstuffs Order, 2002 - Truck carrying ’Dalda’ intercepted and articles seized on the ground of contravention of Orissa Pulses and Edible Oil Dealers’ Licensing Order, 1977 - Order of confiscation - Writ - Seizure was made on 17.8.2001 - At the relevant time dealing in vanaspati by an unlicenced dealer was a contravention of Orissa Pulses and Edible Oil Dealers’ Licensing Order, 1977 - During pendency of the confiscation proceeding the 2002 order having come into operation, the provisions of 2002 order has to be given retrospective operation for the benefit of the petitioner, who is alleged to have sold vanaspati Dalda to an un licenced dealer Impugned order becomes vulnerable and the same is liable to be set aside. (Para 11)

       2. SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1930 - Sec. 51 - E.C. Act, 1955 Sec. 6(A).- Order of confiscation of seized goods - Writ - Truck was seized by the Marketing Officer on road and it had not yet reached the destination or none had acknowledged receipt of the consignment on behalf of the consignee - Transit therefore continued and the petitioner No.1 company for all purposes was the owner of the goods at the time of its seizure - Petitioner No.1 company who had valid licence to deal with vanaspati dalda continued to be the owner of the vanaspati dalda, no contravention can be held to have occasioned by the time of the seizure and the consequent order of confiscation is not sustainable in the eye of law-Impugned order set aside. (Paras - 16 to 18)

JUDGMENT

C.R. Dash, J. - This writ petition is directed against the order of confiscation dated 07.12.2002 passed by the Collector & District Magistrate, Sundargarh under Section 6(A) of the Essential Commodities Act, 1956 (for short ‘the Act’) vide Annexure-9, in Misc. Case No.40 of 2001, directing confiscation of the value of the seized commodities, i.e. by encashings Bank Guarantee furnished by petitioner no.1 to the tune of Rs.3,00,000/-(three lakhs) while taking interim release of the seized stock of ‘Dalda’ and calling upon petitioner no.1 to deposit the differential amount of Rs.88,876/-(eighty-eight thousand eight hundred and seventy-six) and the truck bearing Registration No. OSU-3915.

2. The brief fact of the case relevant for disposal of this writ petition is as follows:

Petitioner no.1 is a company having one of its depots at Mahanadi Clearing House, Gopalpur, NH-5, Cuttack. It is engaged in manufacturing and distribution of consumer goods and food articles like Vanaspati, Jam, Jelly and other products. Petitioner no.1 – company never does any retail business and it used to supply goods from its Cuttack depot to the dealers / distributors all-over Odisha. By two invoices dated 16.08.2001 (Annexure-1) the petitioner dispatched 485 cases or 87 quintals 900 grams of Vanaspati Dalda, Mixed Fruit Jam in 24 cases and Tomato Sauce in 25 cases to M/s. Santosh Traders, Vedavyas. The consignee M/s. Santosh Traders at Vedavyas had paid for the aforesaid consignment through Cheque No.548627, dated 16.08.2001. The aforesaid goods were entrusted to the Transporters and the transportation was effected in Truck No. OSU-3915 on 16.08.2001.

At about 5.30 P.M. on 17.08.2001 the Marketing Inspector, Enforcement Squad, Panposh intercepted the aforesaid truck in Vedavyas Chowk in front of Bhagabati Weigh Bridge and seized the aforementioned articles and the truck vide Seizure List dated 17.08.2001 on the ground that the said Marketing Inspector had reason to believe that there has been contravention of Orissa Pulses and Edible Oil Dealers’ Licensing Order, 1977 (‘Licensing Order’ for short). The Marketing Inspector also seized the Way Bill, Chalan-cum-Consignment Note, two invoices (copies of which have been filed as Annexure-1) and other documents vide Seizure List (Annexure-2). On 18.08.2001 the Marketing Inspector submitted report before the Collector, Sundargarh (opp. party) and made a prayer for confiscation and interim disposal of the seized commodities. Learned Collector (opp. party) passed order for issuance of notice to the driver of the vehicle to show cause. He also directed the Marketing Inspector to release the Jam and Sauce in favour of the persons from whom seized, as those articles were not essential commodities. Petitioner no.1 however appeared suo motu before the Collector (opp. party) for release of the seized goods in favour of petitioner no.1 pending enquiry in the proceeding under Section 6(A) of the Act. In lieu of the release of the seized commodities and the truck in favour of petitioner no.1, the Bank Guarantee of Rs.3,00,000/-(three lakhs) was given after intervention of this Court in O.J.C. No.15613 of 2001 filed by the petitioner challenging the order of interim release passed by the Collector (opp. party) directing furnishing of security of Rs.3,00,000/-(three lakhs) in the shape of TDR in a nationalized Bank pledged in favour of the Collector, Sundargarh. Subsequently on 08.02.2002 petitioner no.1 filed a petition praying therein to drop the confiscation proceeding under Section 6(A) of the Act on various grounds.

Learned Collector, Sundargarh (opp. party) on 07.12.2002 passed the impugned order vide Annexure-9 directing confiscation of the value of the seized commodities, i.e. by encashing the bank guarantee furnished by petitioner no.1 to the tune of Rs.3,00,000/-(three lakhs) and calling upon petitioner no.1 to deposit the differential amount of Rs.88,876/-and the truck bearing No. OSU-3915. The petitioner















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top