ORDER

1. Though the matter is listed for admission, but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, it is taken up for final disposal.

2. Heard Mr. G.A.R. Dora, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjeev Udgata, learned Advocate for opposite party No.2. Though notice was issued to opposite party No.1, but none appears when the matter is taken up.

3. The case of the petitioner is that he has passed the degree course in Architecture in first class. Pursuant to the advertisement dated 25.07.2009 for the posts of lecturer in Architecture, issued by the Principal, College of Engineering and Technology (in short "CET"), opposite party No.1 he appeared at the interview. In the said interview he was selected. On 29.08.2009 vide Annexure-2, opposite party No.1 issued an office order appointing the petitioner as a lecturer in Architecture on contractual basis. On 8.07.2010, opposite party No. 2 issued an office order appointing the petitioner with consolidated remuneration w.e.f. 1.07.2010 to 31.12.2010 or till the post was filled up by the Biju Patnaik University and Technology (in short "BPUT"), opposite party No.1 in regular manner, whichever is earlier. It is fu