SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ori) 31

M.M.DAS, R.DASH
Chandra Nandi – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate appeared:
For the Petitioner: Soubhagya S. Das, R. Sahoo, K.C. Mohapatra

ORDER :

24.01.2014 - Heard.

The petitioner approached the learned Orissa Administrative Tribunal seeking pension and gratuity. The learned Tribunal, though directed for payment of gratuity to the petitioner, but however, failed to issue any direction for grant of any pension to the petitioner.

On considering the finding of the learned Tribunal, we are of the considered view that the learned Tribunal has failed to exercise its jurisdiction in issuing any direction with regard to grant of pension to the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State, on the contrary, submits that in order to be eligible to receive minimum pension, the petitioner should have been regularized at least one day prior to his superannuation. We find that failure to regularize him as a part of inaction on the part of the State.

We, therefore, direct that the petitioner should be treated to have been regularized in service at least one day prior to his superannuation notionally and we further direct that calculating his entitlements, his pension amount shall be fixed by the opposite parties - State, in accordance with the rules and the arrear pension of the petitioner so calculated shall be paid to the petitioner by t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top