SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ori) 168

I.MAHANTY
Ajaya Kumar Samantaray – Appellant
Versus
Ranjita Das – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For Petitioner: M/s. S. Ray & C.R. Nandy
For Opp. Party :Mr. G. Rath, Sr. Advocate

Judgment

I. Mahanty, J.

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has come to be filed by the petitioner-Ajaya Kumar Samantaray seeking to challenge an order dated 12.08.2002 passed in Criminal Revision No.50 of 2001 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Khurdha confirming the order dated 12.09.2001 passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Khurdha in Criminal Misc. Case No.138 of 1999/T.R. No.203 of 2000.

2. Shorn of any unnecessary details, it is suffice to note that a proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was initiated by the opposite party-wife seeking maintenance from the petitioner-husband. The said petition came to be allowed by order dated 12.09.2001 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay a sum of Rs.500/-per month as maintenance to the opposite party from the date of filing of the case i.e. 12.08.1999. That order was challenged by the petitioner in Criminal Revision No.50 of 2001 before the court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Khurdha. The said revision came to be dismissed by order dated 12.08.2002 affirming the order passed by the learned J.M.F.C., Khurdha. It appears that both the aforesaid orders earlier challenged by the present petitioner before this Court in a




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top