JUDGMENT

B.R. Sarangi, J.

1. The claimants in MAC Case No. 133 of 2006 as petitioners have filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 03.09.2014 passed by learned 2nd Additional District Judge cum M.A.C.T. Cuttack rejecting the petition for premature withdrawal of the fixed deposit amount.

2. The factual matrix of the case in hand is that the petitioners being the parents of their deceased son, who died in a motor vehicle accident, along with their daughter, filed an application before the Tribunal for grant of compensation in MAC Case No. 133 of 2006. After hearing the parties, the said MAC Case was disposed of awarding compensation in favour of the petitioners. However, learned Tribunal directed that out of the awarded compensation amount, a sum of rupees one lakh each would be kept in fixed deposit in the name of each of the petitioners for a period of six years in any Nationalized Bank. In compliance with the same, such amount was deposited with the opposite party no.3 Bank. Petitioners who are the parents of the deceased filed an application for withdrawal of Rs.50,000/- to meet the financial stringency. Therefore, that being allowed, an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- rem