AMITAVA ROY, A.K.RATH
T. Bimala – Appellant
Versus
Cuttack Municipal Corporation, Cuttack – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. A.K. Rath, J.
This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 23.02.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.17413 of 2009, whereby and whereunder the writ application filed by the appellant claiming compensation for the death of her son in electrocution has been dismissed.
02. The unfortunate mother is the appellant. Her son T. Kailash Rao was working as a daily wage earner under the contractors of the Cuttack Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the Corporation”). On 15.05.2009 on the instruction of the Junior Engineer of the Corporation, he was cleaning the drain near Sunshine Field, Cuttack. During such cleaning, he suddenly came in contact with the live electric wire and died at the spot due to electrocution. Immediately after the accidental death, the Mayor of the Corporation came to the spot and paid an ex gratia of Rs.10,000/-. Thereafter neither the Municipal authorities, nor the electricity authorities paid any compensation to the appellant. An F.I.R. was also lodged by the Sub-Divisional Officer, whereafter Purighat P.S. Case No.49(5) of 2009 was registered against one Babuli Sahoo under Sections 338/379/304(A
S.D.O. Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. and others v. Timudu Oram
M.S. Grewal v. Deep Chand Sood
Kaushnuma Begum v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
M.P. Electricity Board v. Shail Kumar and others
Chairman, Grid Corporation of Orissa Ltd. (GRIDCO) and others v. Smt. Sukamani Das and another
Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa
Ramesh Singh Pawar v. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board and others
Gujarat State Road Transport Corpn. V. Ramanbhai Prabhatbhai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.