SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 101

A.K.RATH
Baishnab Charan Palei – Appellant
Versus
Padmanav Rout – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Pranab Ku.Samantaray Advocate
For the Opposite parties :Mr.A.R. Panigrahi Advocate

JUDGMENT :

A.K. Rath, J.

This petition challenges the order dated 30.9.2010 passed by the learned District Judge, Keonjhar in C.R.P.No.1 of 2010. By the said order, the learned revisional court rejected the application of the judgment-debtor-petitioner to stay the further proceeding of the Execution Case No.24 of 2008 of the court of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Keonjhar.

2. The opposite parties as plaintiffs instituted C.S.No.65 of 2005 in the court of the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Keonjhar for declaration of right, title, interest in respect of the suit schedule land, recovery of possession and permanent injunction impleading the petitioner as defendant. The learned trial court decreed the suit on 10.12.2007. Thereafter the decree was drawn up on 21.12.2007. The ordering portion of the judgment reads as follows:-

“The suit is decreed in part on contest against the defendant without costs. The right, title and interest of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit plot is declared and their possession in respect thereof is confirmed. The defendant is permanently restrained from interfering with the possession of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit plot in any manner








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top