SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ori) 378

BISWANATH RATH
Khirodini – Appellant
Versus
Dinamani Suna – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : B.K. Routray
For the Respondent: A.R. Panigrahi

ORDER :

Biswanath Rath, J.

1. Heard Mr. B.K. Routray, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.R. Panigrahi, learned counsel for the sole opposite party.

2. This CMP has been filed assailing the order dated 30.01.2015 passed by the Additional District Judge, Padampur in disposal of the Interim Application No. 02/04 of 2012-13 arising out of Matrimonial Appeal No. 01/98 of 2012-13.

3. Short fact as borne out from the case record is that in the application under Section 13(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 at the instance of the husband (present opposite party) for divorce, the wife as opposite party filed an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 151 of CPC claiming a sum of Rs. 4000/- each as interim maintenance per month in favour of both mother and child, a sum of Rs. 30,000/- towards litigation expenses and a sum of Rs. 20,000/- to meet medical and educational expenses for the child (present petitioner No. 2). In filing the application, the wife has submitted that she is residing separate from the husband and the petitioner No. 2 i.e. minor child is also prosecuting his study in class-II in Aurobindo Sikhya Kendra, Padampur. In making the






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top