A.K.RATH
Surendra Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Rath, J.
This petition challenges the letter dated 10.9.2015 issued by the Secretary, Cuttack Development Authority, vide Annexure-1 whereby the petitioner was requested to submit E.P.F. Pension form for payment of retiral benefits. An ancillary prayer has been made for a direction to the opposite parties to grant pension to the petitioner under the Orissa Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992 (in short, ‘OCSP Rules, 1992’) since he has retired prior to commencement of Odisha Development Authorities (Retirement Benefit of the Employees) Rules, 2015 (in short, ‘Rules, 2015’).
2. The case of the petitioner is that he was working as a Driver in Cuttack Development Authority (in short, ‘C.D.A.’). He joined in service on 24.10.1980 under the Greater Cuttack Improvement Trust (in short, ‘G.C.I.T.’), which was later merged with the C.D.A. by virtue of Sec.128 of the Orissa Development Authorities Act, 1982 (in short, ‘Act, 1982’). The G.C.I.T. constituted under the Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1956 had adopted Orissa Service Code. The C.D.A. had adopted the same. The petitioner had retired from services on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.08.2012. He recei
Anwar Hasan Khan Vs. Mohammad Shafi and Ors.
Krishna Kumar Vs. Union of India and others
Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and others Vs. State of Kerala and another
M/s. Madras Petrochem Ltd. and another Vs. BIFR and others
Union of India and others Vs. Filip Tiago De Gama of Vedem Vaso De Gama
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.