SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 701

A.K.RATH
Kamaljit Mishra (dead) – Appellant
Versus
Suchitra Mishra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ms. Savitri Ratho.
For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Mohanty, Mr. S.K. Sarangi.

JUDGMENT :

A.K. RATH, J.

This is an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 22.10.2009 and 3.11.2009 respectively of the learned District Judge, Sambalpur in R.F.A.No.6/3 of 2007-08 confirming the judgment and decree dated 11.12.2006 and 21.12.2006 of the learned Civil Judge (Sr.Division), Sambalpur in T.S.No.41 of 2001.

2. The following genealogy would show the relationship of the parties.

Hari Prasad Mishra (D.3)(dead) = Suchitra Mishra (Plaintiff)

Surjit (Son) (D.1)

Kamaljit (Son)

(D.2)(dead) = Ashalata

Smt.Leela (D.3 (a))

Sudha (D.3(b))

(5) Smt.Smita (D.3 (c)(dead))

Sukanya

Namrata

Nirlipta

Ramanarayan

3. Case of the plaintiff was that T.S.No.83 of 1990 was instituted by defendants 1 and 2 against defendant no.3 for partition. The same was decreed in terms of a compromise petition dated 16.4.1991. She was not a party to the suit. No share was allotted to her. She came to know about the suit and compromise decree in the month of January, 2001. With the aforesaid factual scenario, the suit was filed for a declaration that the compromise

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top