SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 708

D.DASH
Pramod Kumar Biswal – Appellant
Versus
Nimain Charan Mantri – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :M/s. K.M.Mishra, B.K.Sinha, T.Sinha, S.Chakravarty and M.Joshi, advocates.

JUDGMENT :

This appeal has been filed challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Ad hoc Addl. District Judge, FTC IV, Cuttack in RFA No. 128 of 2003 confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.), 2nd Court, Cuttack in T.S 173/01 (196/87).

The appellants as the plaintiffs filed the above noted suit against the respondent-defendants for declaration of their right, title, interest and possession over the suit property better described in schedule appended to the plaint with further reliefs of cancellation of orders passed by the Consolidation Officer, Deputy Director, Commissioner, Consolidation as null and void being without jurisdiction. The suit having been dismissed, these appellants being the unsuccessful plaintiffs have carried an appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The lower appellate court having declined to set aside the findings of the trial court as also the order of dismissal of the suit, the present second appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Code.

2. For the sake of convenience, in order to bring in clarity and avoid confusion, the parties hereinafter have been referred to as they have been arrai


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top