SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 491

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK
VINEET SARAN AND B.R. SARANGI, JJ.
Sarat Chandra Mohanty - Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa and others - Respondents
Writ Appeal No. 88 of 2016
Decided On : 23-08-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :M/s. Sanjib Ray, D.S. Ray and S.C. Das, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. B. Bhuyan, Addl. Govt. Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for willful omission or violation and the satisfaction of the Collector that the further continuance of the elected representative in office would be detrimental to the interest of the Grama Panchayat or the inhabitants of the Grama for a valid suspension under Section 115(1) of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964.

Headnote:

Suspension - Elected Sarpanch - Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, Section 19, Section 115(1) and (2) - The court discussed the provisions of Section 19 and Section 115(1) and (2) of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, which deal with the powers, duties, and functions of an elected Sarpanch and the suspension and removal of Sarpanch or Naib-Sarpanch. The court emphasized the cumulative requirements for suspension, including the need for willful omission or violation and the satisfaction of the Collector that the further continuance of the elected representative in office would be detrimental to the interest of the Grama Panchayat or the inhabitants of the Grama.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, an elected Sarpanch, challenged the order of suspension passed against him for alleged violation of Section 19 of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the suspension order was passed without following due procedure as envisaged under Sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 115 of the Act, and therefore, quashed the order of suspension.

Issues: The issues revolved around the compliance with the provisions of Section 19 and Section 115(1) and (2) of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964, in the context of the suspension of an elected Sarpanch.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for willful omission or violation and the satisfaction of the Collector that the further continuance of the elected representative in office would be detrimental to the interest of the Grama Panchayat or the inhabitants of the Grama for a valid suspension under Section 115(1) of the Act.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was allowed, the order of the learned Single Judge was set aside, and the order of suspension passed by respondent no.3 was quashed.

JUDGMENT :

Dr. B.R. SARANGI, J.

The appellant, an elected Sarpanch of Jambu Gram Panchayat under Mahakalapada Block in the district of Kendrapara, approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No. 1035 of 2015 assailing the order dated 13.01.2015 passed by respondent no.3 under Sub-section (2) of Section 115 of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act, 1964 (in short “the Act”), whereby, on the allegation of violation of Section 19 of the Act, he was placed under suspension and called upon to explain within 30 days, from the date of its receipt, as to why action as deemed proper would not be taken against him in accordance with law. The said writ application, by order dated 22.06.2015, came to be disposed of by the learned Single Judge by holding that, charge-sheet having already been submitted against the appellant justifying the suspension, he may participate in the disciplinary proceeding to be taken up pursuant to filing of charge-sheet, and that, the disciplinary proceeding be disposed of as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of the said order, after giving opportunity of being heard to all the parties concerned. Hence, this intra Court appeal.

2. Mr. S. Ray, learned counsel appearing for the appellant strenuously urged before this Court that before taking a drastic action of suspension against an elected Sarpanch, the mandatory requirements of the provisions of the Orissa Gram Panchayat Act have not been followed. Therefore, the order of suspension passed by the authority cannot sustain in the eye of law. But, the learned Single Judge, without entering into that aspect of the matter, disposed of the writ application by the impugned order with the observation that, since charge sheet had already been filed, it was to be held that the ground of suspension was there to proceed against the appellant in accordance with law. This being an error apparent on the face of the record, interference of this Court, by means of this intra-Court appeal, is sought for.

3. Mr. B. Bhuyan, learned Addl. Government Advocate, on the other hand, urged that since the appellant did not act in consonance with the provisions contained in Section 19 of the Act, the action taken by the authorities against the appellant was justified and, since, by the time the writ petition was taken up for consideration, charge-sheet had already been laid against the appellant, no fault can be found with the learned Single Judge in directing the appellant to participate in the disciplinary proceeding to be taken up pursuant to such charge-sheet.

4. The above being the rival submissions of the parties, it is worthwhile to have a glance on the provisions of Section 19 as well as Section 115(1) and (2) of the Act, for just and proper adjudication of the case.

“S.19 : Powers, duties and functions of Sarpanch-(1) Save as otherwise expressly provided by or under this Act, the executive powers of the Grama Panchayat for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act, shall be exercised by the Sarpanch, who shall act under the authority of the said Grama Panchayat.

(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of Sub-section (1) the Sarpanch shall, save as otherwise provided in this Act, or the rules made thereunder and subject to such general or special orders as may be issued from time to time by the State Government in that behalf-

(a) convene and preside over the meetings of the Grama Panchayat and conduct, regulate and be responsible for the proper maintenance of the records of the proceeding of the said meetings;

(b) execute documents relating to contracts on behalf of the Grama Sasan;

(c) be responsible for the proper custody of all records and documents, all valuable securities and all properties and assets belonging to or vested in or under the direction, management or control of the Grama Sasan;

(d) be responsible for the proper working of the Grama Panchayat as required by or under this Act;

(e) cause to


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top