SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 1029

S.PUJAHARI
Hotel Rumani – Appellant
Versus
State Pollution Control Board, Odisha – Respondent


ORDER

Heard Mr. Ashok Mohanty, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.K. Mishra, learned counsel for opposite party nos. 1 and 2, the State Pollution Control Board.

The petitioner in this writ petition challenges the show-cause notice issued under Section 33(A) of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (for short “the Act, 1974”) and refusal of consent to operate the petitioner-hotel at Annexure-5.

The case of the writ petitioner is that he is a hotelier and operating since 2003 and discharging sewage to the public sewage and now connected to Sewage Treatment Plant at Mangalaghat and discharging the sewage in conformity with the standard prescribed under Schedule –VI of the Environment (Protection) Rules applicable to the Hotel Industry. The refusal to grant consent to the petitioner in spite of the required fee paid by him could not have been made by the State Pollution Control Board. Consequently, he could not have been directed to show-cause to close his hotel in question by the State Pollution Control Board at Annexure-5.


The aforesaid has been countered by the State Pollution Control Board indicating therein that the hotel of the petitioner has been







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top