SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Ori) 782

S.K.MISHRA
Janmejaya Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


ORDER

20.08.2014Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Dhananjaya Mund and learned Addl.Standing Counsel, Mr. Anupam Rath.

This order arises out of an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’). The petitioners are apprehending arrest for the alleged commission of offence under Sections 341, 323, 324 and 294/34 of the I.P.C.

The learned Addl.Standing Counsel submits that since all the offences are bailable in nature, an application for anticipatory bail is not maintainable. However, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, as per the Criminal Amendment, 2005, Section 324 IPC has been made non-bailable. It was also contended that in the case, out of which this present application arises, two other persons were arrested and produced before the learned S.D.J.M., Athamallik treating the offence under Section 324 IPC to be non-bailable. The learned Magistrate has remanded the accused persons to judicial custody. The present petitioners are apprehending arrest for commission of the aforesaid offences in G.R. Case No.200/2014 of the Court of S.D.J.M., Athamallik, arising out of Handapa P.S. Case No.79/2014.

The Delhi High
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top