SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Ori) 588

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK
S. K. SAHOO, J.
BLAPL No. 2462 of 2015
(Date of Judgment : 26.10.2015)
Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Abhaya Parichha … Petitioner
Versus
State of Orissa … Opp. Party

Advocates:
For Petitioner:Miss Gayatri Patra, Bidyalok Mohapatra, Mohit Agarwal, Pravata RoutAmaresh Chandgotia
For Opp.Party: Mr. Prem Kumar Pattnaik (A.G.A)

Headnote:1. CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973. - Bail - Commercial quantity of Ganja found from the exclusive and conscious possession of the co-accused - Petitioner was charge sheeted under Section 20 (b) (ii) (c)/25/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act - Impleaded in the case only on the confessional statement of the co-accused - No criminal antecedent - Considering the nature of accusation and absence of prima facie materials against the petitioner’s involvement in the commission of offence and taking into account of his period of detention in judicial custody, bail of the petitioner allowed. (Para - 10)

       2. EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 - Secs. 24 and 27 - The Officer-in-charge of a Police Station vested powers under Section 53 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985, are not Police Officers within the meaning of Sec. 25 of the Evidence Act - A confessional statement recorded by such officer in the course of investigation is admissible in evidence. (Para - 8)

       3. NARCOTIC DRUGS & PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985 - Sec. 67 - Powers of an Officer-in-charge of a Police Station under Section 53 of the Act “ is not a Police Officer within the meaning of Section 25 of the Evidence Act” - A statement made under Section 67 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not the same as statement under Section 161 of the Code unless made under threat and coercion - A statement under Sec. 67 of the N.D.P.S. Act is to be used as a confession against the person making it and exclusive from the operation of Secs. 24 to 27 of the Evidence Act. (Para - 8)

JUDGMENT

S. K. SAHOO, J. - The petitioner Abhaya Parichha has filed this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for bail as his prayer for bail was turned down by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Paralakhemundi in G.R. Case No. 27 of 2014 (A) vide order dated 08.04.2015.

2. On 19.07.2014 one Prabhansu Sekher Mishra, Sub- Inspector of Police, Adava Police Station lodged the First Information Report before the Inspector-in-Charge, Adava Police Station, District-Gajapati stating therein that on 19.04.2014 as per the direction of the Inspector-in-Charge, Adava Police Station, the informant along with other police staffs proceeded towards village Chudangapur to verify the authenticity of the information regarding transportation of contraband ganja. At about 8.30 a.m. the raiding party members noticed one Mahindra Max Pick Up Van bearing Registration No. OR-07-N-0849 was coming from village Chudangapur and moving towards Antarba side. Out of suspicion, they stopped the vehicle and found two persons inside the vehicle and there were four jerry bags from which acute smell of contraband ganja was coming out. The driver of the Van disclosed his name as Ramesh Raita and the other person disclosed his name as Pradeep Bira. On being interrogated by the police officials, accused Pradeep Bira disclosed that as per the direction of the petitioner, he procured ganja from the locality and packed the same in four jerry bags and transporting it to Chandiput to the house of the petitioner for commercial purpose. As the persons present in the Van failed to produce any authority regarding transportation of contraband ganja, observing all the formalities, the contraband ganja from inside the jerry bags were weighed by weighman in presence of two independent witnesses and S.D.P.O., R. Udayagiri and it was found in total to be 102 kg. 600 grams. Samples of ganja were drawn from each of the packets and the rest ganja were packed and sealed by the informant by using personal brass seal and keeping paper slips with signatures of witnesses and accused persons. As commercial quantity of ganja was found from the exclusive and conscious possession of co-accused Pradeep Bira and Ramesh Raika, FIR was registered against three persons namely Pradeep Bira and Ramesh Raika, who were found in the vehicle so also against the petitioner under Sections 20(b)(ii)(C) /25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter for short “N.D.P.S. Act”).

3. The Inspector-in-charge of Adava Police Station entrusted Mukesh Lakra, S.I. of Police to investigate the case. During course of investigation, the witnesses were examined, the seized exhibits were sent to Deputy Director, RFSL, Berhampur for chemical analysis. The chemical examination report indicated that the exhibits were found to contain fruiting and flowering tops of cannabis plant i.e. ganja. Though the Investigating Officer conducted several raids in the house of the petitioner to arrest him but he was not traced out and ultimately prayer was made before the learned Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Paralakhemundi to issue non-bailable warrant of arrest against the petitioner. Superintendent of Police, Gajapati supervised the case and as prima facie evidence was found against the petitioner and two co-accused persons, charge sheet was placed against them on 30.09.2014 under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) /25/29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Mohit Agarwal strenuously contended that there is no other material against the petitioner except the confessional statement of one of the co-accused before police which has no got no evidentiary value in the eye of law. He further contended that even though during course of investigation, on a number of occasions raids were conducted in the house of the petitioner but nothing incriminating was found from his house. The learned counsel further urged that the statement of co-accused Pradeep Bira that ganja was procured


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top