SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Ori) 1087

S.PUJAHARI
State of Orissa (G. A. Department) – Appellant
Versus
Debananda Tudu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sangram Das, Standing Counsel (Vigilance)
For the Respondent: Bibhu Prasad Das

ORDER :

Heard Mr. Sangram Das, learned Standing Counsel for the State-Vigilance Department and Mr. B.P. Das, learned Counsel for the opposite party.

2. The State-Vigilance has preferred this appeal seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.01.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge, (Vigilance), Berhampur in G.R. Case No. 04 of 2010 (V) (T.R. No. 65 of 2011).

3. It appears that the opposite party faced his trial in connection with the aforesaid case before the Court of leaned Special Judged (Vigilance), Berhampur as he allegedly demanded illegal gratification as a public servant to discharge his official duty i.e. for surgery of breast cancer of wife of the complainant-decoy. A trap was laid by the Vigilance Police on the complainant of the complainant-decoy and the opposite party was caught for accepting the bribe. But, in the conclusion of trial, since the complainant-decoy and the accompanying witnesses did not support the case of the prosecution and turned hostile even though the tainted money was recovered in the trap laid by the Vigilance Police, the trial Court acquitted the opposite party vide the impugned judgment and order.

4. Challenging the aforesa









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top