VINEET SARAN, B.R.SARANGI
High Court Bar Association, Odisha – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Vineet Saran, J.
1. These two writ petitions have been filed with regard to an incident which is alleged to be occurred in the premises of the High Court on 07.02.2017.
2. The first writ petition is filed by the High Court Bar Association, Odisha, on behalf of the lawyers of Orissa High Court praying that a Judicial Commission be constituted to enquire into the alleged incident which had occurred on 07.02.2017 and also for issue of a direction to the Press as well as Electronic Media not to publish or telecast colourable, exaggerated, unverified and unnecessary news on the issue involved in the matter, as it will not only worsen the situation, but completely tarnish and damage the reputation of the institution.
3. The second writ petition has been filed by a practicing advocate of Orissa High Court with similar prayers. For the present, the prayer which is pressed by the petitioners is for an interim direction to the Print and Electronic Media not to publish any news with regard to the alleged incident, as the same is tarnishing the image of the High Court as an institution, and lawyers in general.
4. We shall treat the writ petition No. 2711 of 2017 as the leading petition. In
M.P. Lohia, v. State of West Bengal
Naresh Shridhar Mirajkar v. State of Maharasht AIR 1967 SC 1
Ranjitsing Brahajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra
Sidhartha Vashisht @ Manu Sharma v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
S.P. Gupta v. President of India
Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.