A.K.RATH
Govinda Nahak – Appellant
Versus
Juria Gouda – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.K. Rath, J.
This petition challenges the order dated 16.12.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aska. By the said order, the learned trial court rejected application of the defendants under Order 26 Rule 9 C.P.C. to appoint S.D.O., Minor Irrigation, Hinjilicut as Commissioner for local investigation and to submit report about the water channel.
2. The opposite parties as plaintiffs instituted the suit for mandatory injunction directing the petitioners-defendants to fill the channel over the suit land and permanent injunction. The case of the plaintiffs is that the suit land appertaining to Hal Khata Nos.552 and 91, Hal Plot Nos.1382, 1376 and 1334 measuring an area Ac.0.210 dec. of mouza-Sahaspur under Sanakhemundi Tahasil belong to them. The Government of Orissa constructed the Rushikulya canal, which passes through village Sahaspur. The said canal exists to the west of the suit plot. While the matter stood thus, some of the villagers of Sahaspur including the defendants-petitioners, who belong to village Tulasipadar, dug a channel in the year 1987 for the purpose of irrigation and damaged crops. The plaintiffs filed Misc. Case No.5 of 1987 before th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.