A.K.RATH
Nabaghana Mohapatra – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chandra Bastia – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Dr. A.K. Rath, J.
By this application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is made to the order dated 17.11.2016 passed by the learned 2nd Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Bhubaneswar in C.S. No.123 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, learned trial court rejected the application of the defendant-petitioner to stay the further proceeding of the suit till disposal of Consolidation Revision Case No.97 of 2016 pending before the Commissioner, Consolidation and Settlement, Odisha, Bhubaneswar.
2. Since the dispute lies in a narrow compass, it is not necessary to recount in detail the cases of the parties. Suffice it to say that the opposite parties as plaintiffs instituted the suit for permanent injunction impleading the petitioner as defendant. The defendant filed written statement. While the matter stood thus, the defendant filed an application to stay the further proceeding of the suit till disposal of Consolidation Revision Case No.97 of 2016 pending in the court of the Commissioner, Consolidation and Settlement, Odisha, Bhubaneswar. It is stated that in the consolidation as well as the suit, parties are same so also the property. The plaintiff filed obj
Chandrasekhar Mohanty and others v. State of Orissa and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.